Friday, November 26, 2010

Breaking News: People eat food on Thanksgiving; shop on Friday

My thanksgiving was good, but could have been better if I only had more of two things:  1) Status updates about how much people ate on Thanksgiving, and 2) more news media reports about how people shop on the Friday after Thanksgiving.  I feel I don't get enough of these things around Thanksgiving.  Please remedy this.

T'WAS THE NIGHT BEFORE THANKSGIVING.  And I got back on the wagon with my first drink since August 22.  That's 94 days without a drink.  The beverage?



Just a beer, man.  Although I appear to be in some sort of standoff with the beer in this photo.  And my head broke the flash on my buddy's camera. The first beer actually tasted like the first beer I ever had in my life, back on June 13, 2006.  I forgot that beer was an acquired taste and thought, "wow, this isn't very good."  Then I got used to it again and all was well.  Big middle finger to all of you who voted for Four Loko which would have actually killed me. 

We went to the always-terrible Fishbones which was more terrible than I remember it on previous nights-before-Thanksgiving.  Just packed beyond belief.  It's usually sorta-packed with tons of people in the vicinity of my age, which is fine, since I only have to deal with that high-school reunion stuff about once a year.  But somebody dragged about six busloads of forty-somethings into the bar this year.  Which...give it up folks.  Game's over.  Go ruin your life and have kids or something. 

One thing I can't handle at the bar right now:  Screaming so somebody else can hear me.  My voice goes pretty quickly, which is partly a hydration issue and partly a part-of-my-lung-is-included-in-the-blast-zone issue. 

You know what is loads of fun thought?  Saying hi to somebody I haven't seen in a while and watching them stare at me for about 4 seconds before they put two and two together and figure out who I am.  That's good for at least an hour of fun. 

BIGGER HARDASSES:  TSA OR COPS OUTSIDE THE TERMINAL?  I went to pick up Emily from the airport on Wednesday night.  The drive wasn't bad until I made it to the airport, where there was about a half-mile long line to pick up passengers.  When I got near the terminal building I saw this:


If you can't make out what's going on there, neither can I .  The sign says something is going to be "strictly enforced."  Government agencies say that all the time so everybody can just ignore that.  But there's also a line of cones with three cop cars blocking two lanes.  I'm sure there's a reason for this; I can't figure out what it is.  It's probably a pretty crappy one. Something about security.  Terrorists.  9/11.  Whatever. 

In any event, the cops who apparently were riding in the cars that were blocking two lanes in front of a half-mile line were out wandering around the mass of traffic blowing whistles and swinging their flashlights at everybody.  A few seconds after this photo was taken, a cop walked in front of my car, put a cone in front of it, and started gesturing for me to go around the cone.  I thought better of taking a picture of him.  I know bad things happen when you try to photograph public employees performing public duties in public places. 

Anyway, I successfully didn't get arrested and managed to pick up Emily.

THE POLL BEFORE THE "WHAT SHOULD NICK DRINK?" POLL.  Those were all real events in Nick's life.  I'm a little surprised the Bar Exam won.  I know I had cancer and everything, but there's like a 75-80% pass rate and I've always been good on standardized tests (I can focus for a few hours or days; I tend to get bored over the course of a four-month class). 

But the other things are real too.  I actually did chase down and tackle a robbery suspect, although the coolness of that feat is slightly mitigated by the fact that the dude lost his shoes as he was running from the cops.  And I was in a car for part of the chase.  But still - true story.

The double-stabbing up in East Lansing was just a matter of me and a buddy being in the right (wrong?) place at the right (wrong?) time.  I figure stabbings are pretty common occurrences in East Lansing, but as I was from Ann Arbor, I wasn't very familiar with the practice.  In any event, I managed to end up in the mix of one of these things and ended up giving first aid to a couple of victims.  I had a blood covered shirt to prove it.

THERE IS ROUGHLY ZERO CHANCE OF ME SHOPPING TODAY.  My shoulder is sore and that's the shoulder I use when I'm running people over to get an Xbox or something, so no shopping for me today.  Although one of my goals in life is to be involved in a WalMart stampede at some point.  You gotta find the right WalMart at the right time, but I imagine it's a magical experience.  I also want to use one of those carts that are intended for handicapped people but are inevitably used by fat people.  I was hoping to cross both of these things off my list today, but I decided to sleep in instead.  Maybe next year.

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Happy Thanksgiving

A picture and a note from a friend:

Hey Nick,
I haven't really emailed you before now because I had nothing to say that you hadn't heard before.  I could've told you that [my wife] and I were keeping you in our thoughts (which is true), but really that doesn't mean anything so I decided not to waste your time.  I will say that I've been reading your blog on the regular and greatly enjoying it, at least the parts not involving you getting screwed by cancer that likes to disguise itself as other cancers.
But I thought I had a decent reason to email you now... before moving back to New York some friends and I decided to organize a softball team in a Zog Sports League.  Zog Sports is basically coed intramurals for 20-somethings, and  the winning team has a donation made to the charity of their choice.  My friends and I - The Bag Guys - were the winning team and we chose to make a donation to the Lymphoma Research Foundation because of you.  As a intramural sports all-star yourself, I thought you'd appreciate this. 
I realize this is not particularly important in the grand scheme of things, and really doesn't help you at all in your current situation.  As such, I figure there's a 50% chance that you're thinking that I've wasted a significant amount of your time with this email since playing softball is not a particularly heroic way to fight cancer.  But there's also a 50% chance that you'd think it moderately cool that a group of people who you (mostly) haven't met played an undefeated season of intramural sports in your honor. 
Anyway,  your writing has been awesome and I'm rooting for you to beat the shit out of this cancer.  Here's a picture of our softball team.  Why are they flipping the camera off?  Because Fuck Cancer, that's why.
Whatever pain cancer chooses to inflict, it will never outweigh the kindness other people - even people I don't know - have shown me over the past few months.  For this, I am thankful.

Happy Thanksgiving.

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

A short story: Aspiring lawyers try to figure out how to become lawyers

So my latest contact with the good people of Maryland turned out...quite well actually.  In short, Maryland allows people to be "sworn in by proxy."  Which means I can be sworn in right here in Michigan, by a Michigan judge.  Which saves me the expense and burden of a trip to Annapolis, eliminates the chance of things running into treatment and doctor's appointments, and just makes my December a whole lot better.  Plus my family will be able to be there, which is pretty cool after all everybody has been through since July.

But figuring out that Maryland allowed swearing in by proxy was not easy.  The information just...wasn't anywhere.  At least I don't think so.  I actually read the available info pretty closely and didn't see anything about it.  Fortunately, the confusing nature of the entire process touched off e-mail conversations between me and several friends, which eventually led to the discovery of the swearing in by proxy option.  So, I give you my first short story, "Aspiring Lawyers Attempt to Figure Out How to Be Sworn In."

It starts with an e-mail from a friend a little over a week ago:
ok, now i need your knowledge. any idea if we have to be in MD for the swearing in ceremony? i can't believe how ridiculous they are about this in-person interview thing, which leads me to believe that we have to show up for the swearing in, too. but can someone else swear us in? for instance, a judge in [another state]? i'm really not interested in flying up three times in two weeks for bar stuff... then again, i'm not even having my interview until dec. 5th, which is conveniently two days after "they" have to recommend us (or something) for the swearing in ceremony. so who knows if my question even matters.

this. must. end.
I responded with zero answers, but two questions of my own.  Which provoked this response:
It's unbelievable. Though I am excited I get to see you in just a few weeks -- for the best four hours of our lives. I'm also appreciative of how strongly they feel about us not driving in to Baltimore and parking for the course. Take they subway, they say. The subway?!

First of all, Baltimore's "subway" has one line. I feel like this qualifies it as more of shuttle than a subway. Second, this is what happens on a Baltimore subway: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ep5L9rRiG64. Clearly we should fear for our lives on Baltimore's attempt at mass transit.
Her story checks out.  The Baltimore subway is a glorified people mover that apparently moves people from nowhere to nowhere.  And she's also right that we've been borderline threatened about not driving into Baltimore for this course. 

So that's how things sat for a couple days:  Friend asked me questions, I had no answers but more questions, we made fun of the subway, and that was that.  But then I found this site, with what appeared to be relevant info on the Maryland swearing in ceremony.  The relevant info reads as follows:
Candidates are required to check in not later than forty-five minutes prior to the scheduled ceremony.  Information will be mailed in approximately 10 days as to your assigned times.  Due to the number of candidates for admission, there will be NO CHANGES made to the class assignments.  If you do not receive your information packet within two weeks, contact the State Board of Law Examiners at (410) 260-3640 to verify clearance for admission. If you are unable to appear at your scheduled time, you MUST IMMEDIATELY contact the Clerk's Office at 410-260-1500. After the ceremonies in December, the next scheduled bar admissions will take place on Thursday, January 6, 2011.
Bolding and caps-ing in original, of course.  But this...didn't really help us much.  Because it seemed to raise more questions than it answered.  The same paragraph, this time with commentary:
Candidates are required [actually required?  Or fake required?] to check in not later than forty-five minutes prior to the scheduled ceremony [So we can sit there for an hour?].  Information will be mailed in approximately 10 days [of what?!] as to your assigned times.  Due to the number of candidates for admission, there will be NO CHANGES made to the class assignments.  If you do not receive your information packet within two weeks [OF WHAT?!?!?!?!], contact the State Board of Law Examiners at (410) 260-3640 to verify clearance [being admitted to the bar or landing an airplane?] for admission. If you are unable to appear at your scheduled time, you MUST IMMEDIATELY [I tried calling at 11:30pm last week.  There was no answer]. contact the Clerk's Office at 410-260-1500. After the ceremonies in December, the next scheduled bar admissions will take place on Thursday, January 6, 2011.
So a recap:  Information will be mailed within 10 days of something.  If I figure out what that something is, I'm supposed to contact the BOLE within two weeks of it if I don't have my information.  And if I determine that I will not be able to appear at my scheduled time, I'm supposed to call another office immediately to inform them of that fact.  But I can't determine if I can appear at my scheduled time without knowing what my scheduled time is.  But I'm going to find out soon.  It will be mailed 10 days after something.  

One day after our discovery, my friend found out that she couldn't be sworn in on time because her interview had been scheduled for two days after the December 3rd deadline.  She called the number and left a message.  I called the number and couldn't even get that far - the phone just rang and rang.

Meanwhile, I told another friend about the apparently real December 3rd deadline.  Friend #2 informed me that her interview was "tentatively" scheduled for December 2nd.  Why "tentatively?"  Well the character & fitness portion of the bar application requires references from every employer you've had in the last five years.  My friend worked at a winery in 2005.  The guy she worked for has since sold the winery.  The winery has since moved to a new location.  But they wanted a reference from new winery owner at new location because...ahh...I don't know...I can't even concoct a logical reason for this one.  But anyway, she can't schedule her character interview until a person she never worked for comments on her "job performance and integrity."

So between myself and two friends we had: One character interview "tentatively" scheduled for the day before the deadline, one interview scheduled for two hours before the deadline, and one interview scheduled for two days after the deadline.  Nothing like cutting it close.  

Finally, mercifully, the saga ended five days ago after Friend #1 talked to a real live human on the phone.  I've said this before and I'll reiterate - once you get a human being on the phone, they are quite nice and rather helpful.  I'm sure this is true about the overwhelming majority of people involved in this process.  It's the system and the process I have a problem with.

So I mailed out my third letter to somebody in Maryland explaining that I have cancer, requesting permission to swear in by proxy, and that's that.  Hopefully all goes well and this whole thing can be wrapped up before the end of the year.  I'll be as happy to finish this whole thing as I will be to finish cancer.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Michigan Liquor Control Comission confused by liquor, loses control

I don't know if there is anything more dangerous than a government official on a mission to "protect the public."  It's the reason I'm jumping through hoop 376 out of 438 just to be a lawyer.  It's the reason the TSA wants to feel you up.  It's the reason the FDA just singled out and banned a drink that contains substances widely available in about a thousand other beverages.

What's even more concerning is just how staggeringly (yes that's a word) incompetent some of these people are.  And here's another example:


CREAM is an alcohol-infused whipped cream.  You can use it like normal whipped cream.  Except it has alcohol in it.  It really doesn't get much simpler than that.

The Michigan Liquor Control Commission - which, presumably, is comprised of individuals who know something about alcohol and...I don't know...controlling it - approved CREAM for sale this summer.  And then they revoked that approval in September.  Why?  Because they didn't know what the product was.  I'm serious:
On Sept. 1, the state “delisted” the product, meaning the state no longer would supply it to retailers.
“What happened was the commission approved it by mistake back in late June,” said Andrea Miller, an MLCC spokeswoman. “I don’t think they knew what the product was.”
Uh...

First of all, there has to be no worse job in the world than "spokesperson."  I'm not sure if you're actually forbidden from having your own thoughts, but it really doesn't matter, because you're not allowed to express them.  Your job is quite literally to sit there and defend some of the dumbest decisions imaginable - decisions you might not agree with and probably find absolutely absurd - using the most boring language possible.  And then you end up like poor Andrea Miller, who has to inform the public that the Michigan Liquor Control Commission was confused by a product that contained liquor.

But don't worry, Ms. Miller gives us reasons!
She said upon further review, the agency decided to suspend sales. “The reasoning behind the delisting was the commission was worried about the possible youth marketplace for that and youth being involved possibly in the sales of that. The commission thought that for the safety, health and welfare of the citizens of Michigan, they should delist this product.” 
Thoughts:  1) Did the MLCC go under the hood and look at video of CREAM?  Did somebody throw a challenge flag?  Why is this "upon further review"?  2)  Ms. Miller's first sentence makes no sense whatsoever.  Read it again: "The reasoning behind the delisting was the commission was worried about the possible youth marketplace for that and youth being involved possibly in the sales of that."  That sentence physically hurts.  This is probably deliberate.  3)  Every commission in the history of commissions has thought that for the "health, safety and welfare of the citizens," something should be banned.  

Also, giant thumbs-up for creating jobs in Michigan!
Molly Pearson, vice president of Temperance Distillery, which helped develop and now bottles the product, said first-month sales were about 1,200 12-bottle cases with projected of sales of 20,000 cases in the next year.
She said the product was introduced in May and is sold in 13 states. It just began being marketed in Michigan.
“Most of it was in Monroe, Bedford, Temperance, but by no means had we even scratched the surface in Michigan,” she said. “We had projected to switch from eight hours to 12-hour shifts, which would have added 20 to 30 jobs, five days a week. Because of not selling in Michigan, we have moved back to an eight-hour shift.”
Protecting the health safety and welfare of citizens by putting them out of work...and driving them to drink.

And omigod read this:
Mrs. Pearson said the state indicated the product “slipped through” the approval process. “They said they didn’t realize it was whipped cream. I don’t know how they didn’t realize it was whipped cream when it says alcohol-infused whipped cream right on the label,” she said.
These are the people protecting you.  Paid with your money.  It really does say it right on the label, by the way.

But you are a terrible person if you don't support this decision.  After all, it's for the children:
“Their thinking was if it’s in a refrigerator, how does a kid know not to grab it when it’s next to whipped cream?” she said.
The Michigan Liquor Control Commission is officially concerned about the placement of items in your refrigerator.  

But then there's Mr. Zeller, a liquor store owner, who gives the most coherent quote in the whole piece (why do liquor store owners seem like the only sane people involved in these issues?):
Mr. Zeiler said he doesn’t understand, given that the sale of liquor is tightly controlled in Michigan. “That’s the crazy thing. We’re liquor stores. We’re not allowed to sell alcohol to young people regardless of what kind of container or form it comes in.”
Hey did you guys know that?  That liquor stores can't sell liquor to kids?  Every time the MLCC bans something "for the children," they tacitly admit that there is absolutely nothing they can do about making sure liquor doesn't get in the hands of children.  And that admission would be correct.  There's absolutely no way to prevent alcohol from getting into the hands of kids.  You can make it slightly more difficult.  That doesn't mean we need to condone or encourage it.  But it also doesn't mean we need to ban everything in a colorful bottle. 

In any event, it has to be a pretty terrible feeling to know that you have a job in which you 1) are never paid with funds that haven't been forcibly stolen from other people, 2) inconvenience and fleece thousands of people who help pay your salary, and 3) have zero impact on the world whatsoever besides banning things that people enjoy and making millions of people jump through meaningless hoops.

But there's a bigger issue here:  This is how government works.  You work at your job, you get a paycheck, and a chunk of that heads up to Lansing or DC.  And a chunk of that money goes to people like this who are entirely detached from reality and serve on "important" and acronym-laden commissions that spend their time bothering people who just want to buy or sell some whipped cream, because the only way they can justify having a job is if they do a lot of stuff.  Romanticized versions of noble, reasonable, and benign government bureaucracies may exist in your head.  They do not exist in reality.  You cannot and will not ever see a competent and reasonable MLCC that bans truly dangerous items - say, poison.  You will only get liquor commissions that claim they were confused by liquor.  You cannot give so much power to so many people and expect it to be used reasonably.  So stop doing it.

Monday, November 22, 2010

Sober Sally's Sociological Synopsis

You know how they say losing one particular sense - sight or hearing, for example - heightens the other senses.  Well losing my ability to drink has heightened all of my senses when I'm out on the weekends.  It's been like taking the restrictor plate off a stock car.  Although I quickly replaced alcohol with toxic drugs, so I didn't have to deal with any withdrawal symptoms. 

I'm much more comfortable at the bar now.  There are really only two things that bother me: 1) If I'm at a terrible bar, one of those "I need to drink to make this tolerable" places, like Rick's in Ann Arbor, and 2) If I have to deal with really drunk people.  I can tolerate most people up to a point, but trying to maintain a conversation with Barry Badrinath or Stumbly McClosetalker at 1am is less than thrilling. 

It's not like I was a raging alcoholic (although according to some government agencies, everyone is a raging alcoholic).  But there's a huge difference between having a beer or two and just drinking water.  For me, at least.  But my niche interests in sociology and human expression and the like have really benefited from my stint as Sober Sally.  I just do a lot of people watching now.  Creepy?  Probably.  But quite interesting.  Particularly in Royal Oak.  Sometimes, seeing so many blowouts makes me feel better about my own hair situation. 

Friday night, I was in Ann Arbor with a few friends from college, where I made it to a very interesting and relatively new restaurant/bar called Grange.  For starters, all restaurants in Ann Arbor are required to put something like this on your menus and website:
At Grange, our commitment to local and sustainable sources reflects both our commitment to the community and our commitment to bringing the best of the farm’s bounty to the table when it’s fresh and at the peak of its flavor.
Join us for seasonal menus inspired by the fresh flavors of local farms and farmers’ markets.
That gets 4 out of 5 points on the "make patrons feel good about eating at your restaurant so you can add $5-$7 onto each entree" scale.  But here's the thing:  Grange serves a lot of game meats - duck, pig, venison.  You know...animals that have been brutally slaughtered.  But the place was packed.  So, props to Grange for finding a way to make Ann Arborites feel good about eating Bambi.

For what it's worth, we ate just about everything on the bar menu, everything was "good" to "excellent," and the place has an outstanding array of drinks and cocktails.  Highly recommended.

From there, it was on to The Arena, one of my favorite bars in Ann Arbor:  Slightly older crowd, best sports bar in town, above-average bar food, and good drink specials.  But The Arena also has Boxer:



Boxer might be one of the most ingenious bar arcade games in the world.  The game is simple: punch the bag as hard as you can.  Put a dollar in this thing, and it's like a mosquito lamp for meatheads.  The first brah puts a dollar in, punches the bag, a number shows up, other brahs gather to try to beat first brah's number, then more brahs gather round and a competition ensues.  They actually make an exploding version if you want to rid your bar of steroid-infused males.  We could have used these during Michigan State week. 

Saturday night brought me to Royal Oak for what appeared to be an unofficial engagement party disguised as a kinda-massive high school reunion - a smaller version of the night before Thanksgiving.  The night was quite fun, but also an excellent display of group dynamics and self-delusion (god I'm a nerd).  I'll explain.

My friends and I sat around on Saturday afternoon attempting to "plan" our evening.  The party was "scheduled" to start at 7:30.  We all know there's no way in hell we are going at that time.  Plus, responsible as we all are, we know it's not a tremendous idea to start drinking at 7:30.  So the plan was to leave at 8pm.  So it was decided: let's head to the party at 8.

But then we got into a second discussion about how there was absolutely no way that we were going to leave at our planned time.  It just wasn't going to happen.  There was football on.  We had like five people involved in the trip.  So we made a plan to leave at 8, knowing full well there was no chance we were actually going to do that.  But if we planned to leave at 9, we knew we wouldn't leave until 10.  And we couldn't do that, because we were supposed to leave our friends' condo to head to the bar at 10.

Which also had no chance of happening on time.  We then sat there and discussed exactly what would happen at "scheduled bar leave time": absolutely nothing.  Ten o'clock would come and go.  We would still be hanging out.  This would go on for approximately one hour.  Then, about an hour after "bar leave time," one of the girls would start screaming about calling cabs.  She would get no responses. Some people would commit, others would pretend they had a ride without actually knowing who their ride was.  At one point, somebody would turn down the music and make an announcement, to which nobody would pay attention.  Then there would be a mass cigarette exodus to the front porch, which means no discussion about leaving for the bars could take place for at least 10 minutes.  Then one of the girls would get frustrated and request a number of cabs.  About half an hour later, the cabs would show up.  One of the girls would scream "the cabs are here!!" and then everybody would find a ride with a driver and walk out of the house toward the poor cab driver who thinks every one of 30-some people are getting in his cab, but nobody ever does.

We discussed all of this on Saturday afternoon.  We left for the party at exactly 9pm.  We left for the bar at 11:24pm.  Seven years after high school, we are one giant, entirely predictable exercise in self-delusion. 

And we're also lemmings.  I had quite a good time hanging out at my friends' condo chatting it up with people.  At no point did I say to myself, "You know what I would like to do right now?  I would like to do this exact same thing with the exact same people, only I would like to be run into every five seconds, scream at you so you can hear me, pay many dollars for each subpar beverage, and be surrounded by a crew of people auditioning for 'Jersey Shore: The Midwest Edition.'  That is what I would like to do." 

We spent the entire trip to the bar - seven people in the vehicle - discussing how much we did not want to go to the bar and how much fun we were having while not at the bar.  We got to the bar and paid the $5 cover only to discuss how disappointed we were to be at the bar.  And then we stood there and had conversations with the same people we were conversing with just twenty minutes earlier at a much more comfortable location half a mile down the street.  I could write a book explaining a lot of things I've figured out over the past few months; this repetitive phenomenon will not be one of them.

One last thing of note: virtually every single one of my friends that I hung out with this weekend has turned out some version of "successful."  Out of the 40 or so people I saw this weekend, about eight were lawyers.  But the rest of my friends actually have decent, useful jobs.  I guess this isn't terribly surprising - we all went to decent high schools and come from pretty good families.  But this is notable when 1) it's the worst economy in a bajillion years and 2) our conversations include sentences like "Remember that time we played baseball on your roof with Jimmy John's subs." 

The reason I mention this:  This fact has a significant impact on my worldview, my politics, and my opinion on things like the Four Loko debacle that I've repeatedly examined on this sight.  Take the approximately 30 people I was with on Saturday night.  If you saw us at a party eight years ago, you would have said, "Oh my god, what a bunch of screw ups."  If you saw us at a party five years ago, you would have said, "Yup, still a bunch of screw ups."  My group of friends probably would have consumed some Four Loko back in the day.  As it was, they just consumed Sparks and Steel Reserve - basically the exact same things as Four Loko, but these things existed before Chuck Schumer figured out that high school kids might be drinking and soiled himself in shock. 

But somewhere in between all that acting like screwups, we found time to go to class, do well in school, go to college, get jobs, and so on.  Take a look in any college bar on a Saturday night, and it might be hard to distinguish one group from another.  But there's a pretty significant difference between people who know when Saturday night ends and those who let Saturday night bleed into Tuesday afternoon.

So the "authorities" - who, quite frankly, have their own heads up their own tailpipes that they can't figure out the rather simple phenomenon that I just described - can ban whatever they want.  It doesn't matter.  Ban Four Loko, people move on to something else.  Shut down a place, people will go somewhere else.  If any government official thinks banning something will have any sort of effect on anything, they're delusional.  It's gotta be tough to be a bureaucrat with so much power, yet so little power to actually affect anything.  The fact of the matter is that there are about a million things that matter more in the grand scheme of things than whether or not somebody drinks Four Loko on the weekend.  And my group of friends is a testament to that.

But as fun as my sociological experience has been, I'm pretty happy to be somewhat normal again.  At least, as normal as I can be.  

19 days without getting poisoned, my longest streak since August

It is really quite amazing how good you feel when you aren't getting poisoned every two weeks.  I'm two and a half weeks out of six cycles of chemo, and I feel great.  In part, that's because I just flat out forgot what "normal" feels like.  And it's also because I'm so incredibly happy to be done with chemo that I really couldn't care less about inconveniences like spending 3 hours in a RadOnc clinic to get 40 seconds of treatment.  Not like I do anything else during the week.

Lot of random thoughts and updates on the weekend, so I'll take a page from the book of Notifying Bar Applicants of Things and go with the bold, allcaps list formation.

MY FIRST TWO-NIGHT-OUT WEEKEND SINCE AUGUST.  Made it out both nights - Ann Arbor on Friday, Royal Oak on Saturday - and had a great time.  For whatever reason, I felt significantly more normal and comfortable being out this weekend.  Nothing's changed really:  I'm still less than three weeks out of chemo, quite hairless, and on a water-only diet at the bar.  But I've either become more comfortable with my current situation, or I'm feeling different because the chemo chapter is now closed (at least for the moment).  Either way, it's much more enjoyable being out now.  More on this in a separate post. 

SYSTEM REBOOT.  The best way I can describe how I feel right now:  It feels like my bodily "systems" are slowly returning to normal one-by-one.  My lungs are starting to come back; I can now run for about 5 minutes straight.  I'm able to lift again.  My face no longer feels like a baseball glove.  My hair is showing signs of life.  If I cut myself, the scar doesn't stay there for a month.  And so on.

I talked to Dr. Anderson about the "comeback" a little bit during my last visit.  He explained that chemo really gets after every cell in the body.  Even the ones that aren't directly affected by the chemo, per se, still suffer the consequences.  So during chemo, your whole body isn't functioning at full capacity.  I don't know if the way I feel is physical or psychological, but I really don't care at the moment. All I know is that it's good to feel somewhat normal again. 

YOU MEAN OUR DEFENSE GAVE UP MANY POINTS AGAIN!?!?  Michigan football is now like Mitch Albom to me:  I won't have any extended commentary on it until it gives me something different than it has been dishing out week after week after week (by the way, Albom wrote two columns this weekend:  one on how bad Michigan's defense is; another on somebody who died.  Rinse and repeat, Mitch).  Michigan is a not-very-good football team who will probably beat bad teams and probably not beat good teams.  We have an excellent offense, mediocre special teams, and an abysmal defense.  We will give up yards and points.  Field goals will probably not go through the uprights.  These things have been established.  There is nothing more to say.

THE MOLD WAS A GOOD CHOICE.  The remedy for the clavicle problem that I described on Friday worked beautifully on Sunday.  In short, the RadOnc people made a mold around my upper body to keep me in place during radiation treatment, and everything went well on Sunday.  Today I was in and out in about 10 minutes.  This is preferable to three hours. 

THE HOME STRETCH.  The Worst Decision of my Life and the prospect of spending months in the hospital to start 2011 aside, I'm in a home stretch of sorts.  I was really hoping I could make it to this past weekend.  Now I'm feeling better, I'm able to go out more, Thanksgiving is around the corner, and then I'm out to Maryland for the MOST IMPORTANT WEEKEND EVAR, then back home for Massive Weekend of Hockey (Red Wings vs. Canadiens & Michigan vs. MSU), then DC move-in, then Christmas, New Year's, and hopefully, DC for good.

Of course, the prospect of doing this pretty much all over again looms large over all this.  My current position is this:  It's pretty close to the worst thing in the world, but there's not much I can do about it at the moment.  Things will never move fast enough for me, and even in the end, I'm not going to have any good answer about what I should do.  So...whatever.  I'll try hard not to beat myself up over the whole thing for the foreseeable future, if only because it just doesn't do much good.  But there's no doubt that this whole thing is tempering my enthusiasm for the potential end of treatment.

I RETURN TO THE GAME ON WEDNESDAY.  My cancer and self-imposed period of alcohol abstinence ends on Wednesday.  With Four Loko now banned, my excitement for this is somewhat tempered.  But it will be good to not be "that guy" at the bar all the time (although I'll still be "that guy" with cancer but whatever).  I'm a little concerned about coming back to the game the night before Thanksgiving.  I might need a few rehab assignments first.  Whether this leads to me drinking in secret during the day on Monday and Tuesday, who knows. 

Anyway, that's the poll this week:  The audience picks my inaugural drink.  The mixed drinks are my mixed drinks of choice (although the Whiskey & Coke has, quite literally, been deemed "unsafe" by the FDA), the Four Loko is thrown in there as a FU to the government, and the beer is in there because it might be nice to just have a beer as my first drink back on the wagon.